Fit in, Fit over
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
Fit in, Fit over
So many "Auto image size" options, just 1 I need is still missing
I mean "Touch window from outside" option from MPC, perhaps ckit could explain it better, I want just get rid of black bars - horizontal or vertical, not just horizontal / just vertical.
Edit:
Existing features (only hotkeys suggestions):
- Fit width - Numpad 1
- Fit height - Numpad 3
New features (suggestions):
- Fit width and height ( = fit in) - Numpad 7
- Fit width or height ( = fit over) - Numpad 9
Why Numpad numbers? They are near other "fit image" keys Numpad / and * and also + / -, other numbers move large images, so all Numpad keys would be to move/zoom/fit image.
These options could be also saved on xnview exit.
XnView 1.90 <x>
I mean "Touch window from outside" option from MPC, perhaps ckit could explain it better, I want just get rid of black bars - horizontal or vertical, not just horizontal / just vertical.
Edit:
Existing features (only hotkeys suggestions):
- Fit width - Numpad 1
- Fit height - Numpad 3
New features (suggestions):
- Fit width and height ( = fit in) - Numpad 7
- Fit width or height ( = fit over) - Numpad 9
Why Numpad numbers? They are near other "fit image" keys Numpad / and * and also + / -, other numbers move large images, so all Numpad keys would be to move/zoom/fit image.
These options could be also saved on xnview exit.
XnView 1.90 <x>
Last edited by Dreamer on Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:09 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Dreamer
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
- Location: QLD, Australia
I use "Touch window from Inside" with a 800x600 MPC window.
While I have a interest in digital video, I'm far from giving advice
While I have a interest in digital video, I'm far from giving advice

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8Ghz, 16Gb DDR4, RX6600XT with Dell U2520D at 2560x1440@60Hz scaling 125%
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro, Windhawk and Wintoys
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro, Windhawk and Wintoys
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
OK... 4:3 AR (aspect ratio) - standard for most CRT monitors is OK, but new LCD monitors with ARs 5:4 or 16:10 have very thin black bars (e.g. all 4:3 images have thin strips on 5:4 LCDs), so it would be useful to have a picture at whole screen - those thin strips are not so important.
Since we have 4 similar options, I think this is at least as important / useful - and perhaps not so hard to implement, since just options "Fit to window width" and "Fit to window height" need to be "merged" (somehow), but I could be wrong, Pierre?
Since we have 4 similar options, I think this is at least as important / useful - and perhaps not so hard to implement, since just options "Fit to window width" and "Fit to window height" need to be "merged" (somehow), but I could be wrong, Pierre?
Dreamer
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: Paris, France
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
No, I mean "no black bars", so it's:
Fit width or height ( = fit over)
So we could change this request (I'll also edit first post):
Existing features (only hotkeys suggestions):
- Fit width - Numpad 1
- Fit height - Numpad 3
New features (suggestions):
- Fit width and height ( = fit in) - Numpad 7
- Fit width or height ( = fit over) - Numpad 9
Why Numpad numbers? They are near other "fit image" keys Numpad / and * and also + / -, other numbers move large images, so all Numpad keys would be to move/zoom/fit image.
These options could be also saved on xnview exit.
Dreamer
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: Paris, France
I don't follow you...Dreamer wrote:No, I mean "no black bars", so it's: Fit width or height ( = fit over)Olivier_G wrote:In my suggestion about Image size, it's called "Fit over".

-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:57 am
Another way to put it is "crop until no borders are left", or until aspect ratio matches the screen. It's not really a crop, since you ban still scroll around it. Instead of using the first edge that meets the border, like now, you use the other.
Wouldn't have much use for it myself, but hey, if others want it...
Wouldn't have much use for it myself, but hey, if others want it...
-
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm
What he means is pretty much: stretch or shrink the image until it fits the whole screen without changing it's proportions.Olivier_G wrote:I don't follow you...Dreamer wrote:No, I mean "no black bars", so it's: Fit width or height ( = fit over)Olivier_G wrote:In my suggestion about Image size, it's called "Fit over".
I have no use for this. I would prefer less Auto-Image-Size options since the current amount is already confusing enough. But that's just me.
Get the bugs fixed, THEN start adding features. It sucks, but someone has to do it.
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:57 am
I'd probably only use something like this with the occasional verrry long image, like Space Lane or tutorials like this (1200x30000, may crash browser!), although those particular ones are close enough to my resolution that living with a small border/crop is okay. Filmstrips like these are the only place I can see it being really useful.
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: Paris, France
I would use it quite often:
- to read/check very long horizontal/vertical documents, like Panorama, Comics/Texts...
- to check my photographs (cropped in different ratios) in large size without having to deal with X+Y panning like at 100%.
etc...
Dreamer, when I said "I don't follow you" it wasn't about understanding the feature. It was about understanding why you replied "No" to the parallel I made with "Fit over" in my previous suggestion. I still believe it's the same. Maybe my explanation there is not good, then...
- to read/check very long horizontal/vertical documents, like Panorama, Comics/Texts...
- to check my photographs (cropped in different ratios) in large size without having to deal with X+Y panning like at 100%.
etc...
Dreamer, when I said "I don't follow you" it wasn't about understanding the feature. It was about understanding why you replied "No" to the parallel I made with "Fit over" in my previous suggestion. I still believe it's the same. Maybe my explanation there is not good, then...

Olivier
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
I just said I meant "Fit width and height ( = fit in)", not "Fit width or height ( = fit over)", but I'm a bit confused now. Exactly I mean "zoom/crop until no borders are left". Anyway, both options (below) would be useful.
- Fit width and height ( = fit in) - Numpad 7
- Fit width or height ( = fit over) - Numpad 9
- Fit width and height ( = fit in) - Numpad 7
- Fit width or height ( = fit over) - Numpad 9
Dreamer