I'm not asking for it to be added (though it would be nice

Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
Hmm, sometimes I'm a bit surprised and puzzled what people read out of texts and mails... ...and then reply. But just a bit..nintendomaniac64 wrote:uhh... Okay... I dunno why, but that kind of answer sounds like the kind of thing a company would say to cover their butts for legal reasons
Have you tried setting a higher resolution using CS_Manager (see posts above)?SharkD wrote:The rendering is pretty crappy. I don't recommend this plugin.
Which archive? Have you deleted/renamed c:\Programme\XnView\PlugIns\CS_SVG.dll?SharkD wrote:.. deleted all the files that were in the archive ...
That's rather interesting considering that as far as I know both the .wmf and .emf file formats (which XnView I believe DOES support natively) both support Vector Graphics (and AFAIK XnView has no problem viewing their vector formats). Considering this I have to side with nintendomaniac64 and agree that the reply does sound a lot like the sort of response a company would give to 'cover it's ass'.helmut wrote:XnView is a tool for displaying raster graphics i.e. graphics based on pixels. Webbrowsers like Firefox have a rendering engine, they render HTML code or SVG (graphic) code into a real visual graphic on your screen (which is again pixel based because monitors are pixel based).
This rendering is very complex and a very different approach to raster based images. This is why XnView does not support SVG (and other vector formats) natively.
C'mon, man, show some respect!the reply does sound a lot like the sort of response a company would give to 'cover it's ass'.