Different minimal scales…

Bugs and Suggestions in XnView Classic which have been resolved

Moderators: XnTriq, xnview

User avatar
Clo
XnThusiast
Posts: 4441
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Different minimal scales…

Postby Clo » Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:08 am

:arrow: Pierre

:) Hello !

• When reducing a view via the NUM key, the minimal scale I can get is 10 %. I use an 1% step.
- From the menus, it's 7%, that's incoherent.
- Please, could you optimize that ?
- When blowing up an image, there is no difference about the maximal scale, it's same as 1,600%.

• Well, that's not a big deal at first glance, but the difference of size is not negligible
i.e. when I need to capture the reduced pic to make a thumb nail as a link to the 1:1 scale image in another HTML page…

• TIA to consider that (minor) issue !

:mrgreen: KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice

User avatar
Clo
XnThusiast
Posts: 4441
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Fixed

Postby Clo » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:28 pm

:arrow: Pierre

:) Hello !

• Fixed in 1.93ß1, thanks !

:mrgreen: KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice

marsh
XnThusiast
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:31 am

Not yet. 7% new minimum.

Postby marsh » Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:35 pm

In beta1 viewer, 7% (using 1% steps) is minimum. Would it be possible to go to 1% in viewer (this is already present in browser's preview)?

User avatar
Clo
XnThusiast
Posts: 4441
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Two percent

Postby Clo » Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:29 pm

:arrow: marsh

:) Hello B. !
…Would it be possible to go to 1% in viewer (this is already present in browser's preview)?

• Here I can't get less than 2% for the Preview, using layout #4.
- Maybe it depends on the monitor type¦size ? I've a 17" CRT classic 3 / 4, 1024×768…
- Paul has 6% minimum (same layout) with LCD 1200×1600 “Portrait” 21"… :?

EDIT :

• Testing further, I discovered the reason, no more mystery :

      Image

• Actually, the shown percentage represents always the minimal fixed space above the status-bar
(shown with the yellow arrow), here 17 pixels, hence it corresponds to a variable percentage of each image…

:mrgreen: KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice

marsh
XnThusiast
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:31 am

Postby marsh » Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:13 pm

Zero % mystery? :)

Image

User avatar
Clo
XnThusiast
Posts: 4441
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:

Miss a decimal part

Postby Clo » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:37 pm

:) Hi B. !

• No mystery : Larger the image at height, smaller the percent of the 17-pixel height strip is, and vice versa.
- But since there is no decimal fraction, whether <1 XnView rounds to lower, hence displays “0”…

:mrgreen: KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice


Return to “Classic - Resolved Bugs & Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests