bug in filelisting

Bugs found in XnView Classic. Please report only one bug per topic!

Moderators: XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply
User avatar
rra
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: The Netherlands

bug in filelisting

Post by rra » Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:57 am

I tried using the filelisting feature of XNVIEW (1.96.1) on a winXP-SP3 system.
If I select eg header/filename/size/date/Exif date/prperties/description all goes well , as can be seen by
next Notepad output:

Name Size Date EXIF Date Properties Description

_DSC4651.JPG 3431.12 20090619 20090619-11:47:34 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4653.JPG 4602.02 20090619 20090619-11:53:29 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4654.JPG 764.00 20090630 20090619-11:56:01 2462x3782,16M
_DSC4655.JPG 4025.03 20090619 20090619-12:04:57 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4657.JPG 1336.58 20090629 20090619-16:50:49 3806x2496,16M
_DSC4658.JPG 4658.28 20090619 20090619-16:51:58 3872x2592,16M
....

If I on the other hand do not select date then the EXIF data field gets scrambled:

Name Size Properties Description

_DSC4651.JPG 3431.12 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4653.JPG 4602.02 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4654.JPG 764.00 2462x3782,16M
_DSC4655.JPG 4025.03 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4657.JPG 1336.58 3806x2496,16M
_DSC4658.JPG 4658.28 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4659.JPG 4046.30 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4660.JPG 4255.13 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4661.JPG 3316.27 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4662.JPG 4264.87 3872x2592,16M
_DSC4663.JPG 3631.26 3872x2592,16M
.......

René

marsh
XnThusiast
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:31 am

Re: bug in filelisting

Post by marsh » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:36 am

confirmed x 2

User avatar
rra
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: bug in filelisting

Post by rra » Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:07 am

If I look at my original posting I see that the listing
doesn't look scrambled,
It seems that the illegal chars of the listing output
weren't copied to the message, I should have posted a screendump-image.

René

marsh
XnThusiast
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:31 am

Re: bug in filelisting

Post by marsh » Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:11 am

rra wrote:If I look at my original posting I see that the listing
doesn't look scrambled,
It seems that the illegal chars of the listing output
weren't copied to the message, I should have posted a screendump-image.

René
Hello,
Apparently, they were edited out because of problem with RSS feed.

Post Reply