MaxSt wrote:DOS386 wrote:APNG is NOT PNG. It also breaks the PNG spec
No it's not. PNG specs allows third-party chunks extensions. If a third-party follows those chunk-naming rules, you cannot accuse them of breaking anything.
They tried to do it "legally and smoothly" but still APNG breaks the purpose of PNG "to store a single static image".
DOS386 wrote:APNG has been rejected by the PNG developers
Not unanimously. Some PNG developers love it.
Right, but the majority said NO.
Your outrage is misplaced anyway, as XnView is the only image viewer that supports APNG. It's a big selling point against competitors.
There is no "outrage". I didn't ask for removing APNG support. Just pointing that it's a controversial enhancement, and PNG support can be complete without APNG support. BTW, the APNG frame decomposition is still broken in NC/XN.
Good
> The iPhone is enormously popular. Silly not to support image
> formats that it supports, bastardized or not.
Ask apple to fix his iPhone ?
> (Given that performance of PNG reading is not affected,
> Apple "PNG" format should also be supported).
It doesn't affect the performance, just ruins a clean standard. One day people might consider the Apple "PNG" as "standard" and the original PNG as "broken". Again, I suggest adding a <enable support for broken Apple "PNG" files> option (off by default) and a warning into the history: <added support for broken Apple "PNG" files, must be enabled before using, note that those files are NOT valid PNG>.
There is indeed no WinZIP under my rock.