Just wondering why that is.. considering XnView Mp still lacks plenty of useful features that are in Classic..
like this small one.. [View]>[Auto-Image-Resize]>[Fit image to desktop, large only] <<<which still does not exist in MP and yet I find incredibly useful.
Back classic for another year I guess.
Opening an image that uses XnViewMP alot slower than Classic
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 3:23 pm
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 45254
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: Opening an image that uses XnViewMP alot slower than Classic
Which one?
when viewing?like this small one.. [View]>[Auto-Image-Resize]>[Fit image to desktop, large only] <<<which still does not exist in MP and yet I find incredibly useful.
Pierre.
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 3:23 pm
Re: Opening an image that uses XnViewMP alot slower than Classic
yeah when viewing... like with xnview not open.. .open image, xnview opens.. with that above option, the window is resized for a large image better...that option in xnviewmp doesn't exist...
and yeah howcome xnviewmp just takes longer to start to xnview ... like with both of them on a ramdisk.. its seconds later before xnviewmp loads.. xnview classic is instant... not that really matters..well actually I take that back.. seconds matter I like instant

-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 3:23 pm
Re: Opening an image that uses XnViewMP alot slower than Classic
I can't believe this still isn't in 1.0 which I've just finally got around to trying...
" [View]>[Auto-Image-Resize]>[Fit image to desktop, large only] <<<which still does not exist in MP and yet I find incredibly useful."
" [View]>[Auto-Image-Resize]>[Fit image to desktop, large only] <<<which still does not exist in MP and yet I find incredibly useful."