Good morning,
I tried a batch conversion operation to just resize a bunch of files in bulk.
The conversion seems to happen without errors, yet the converted files are not stored to disk, even though the output reports this happened.
Did I forget to click something or is this indeed a bug?
Kind regards,
TB
Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
Moderators: xnview, Dreamer
-
TomBar3
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2021 9:02 am
Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 47521
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
all seems to be correct, you have not the files in status tab?
Pierre.
-
TomBar3
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2021 9:02 am
Re: Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
Hello Pierre,
Here is the screenshot of the status tab.
It mentions the files are saved, but they are not on disk...
Here is the screenshot of the status tab.
It mentions the files are saved, but they are not on disk...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
cday
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4514
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:45 am
- Location: Cheltenham, U.K.
Re: Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
Your problem may be that you are saving to JPEG Guetzli format which can be *very* slow to produce an output; the format is not really suitable for everyday general use for larger images.
But the status tab does show an output being produced, you might try outputting to a standard JPEG format to test.
But the status tab does show an output being produced, you might try outputting to a standard JPEG format to test.
-
TomBar3
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2021 9:02 am
Re: Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
I switched to a different JPG: It worked!! 
Great!!
So I notice the output is A LOT FASTER too.
But this means that using Guetzli, the output seems to be generated (because the processing happens) but the result file is not written (on my machine).
Might there be a bug using that format?
Great!!
So I notice the output is A LOT FASTER too.
But this means that using Guetzli, the output seems to be generated (because the processing happens) but the result file is not written (on my machine).
Might there be a bug using that format?
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 47521
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: Batch convertor resize not saving converted files - 0.98 64bit
There is currently a problem with JPEG (Guetzli) and large image
Pierre.