Cache maintainance: sortable columns & include/exclude l

Ideas for improvements and requests for new features in XnView Classic

Moderators: XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply
jonet
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:30 pm

Cache maintainance: sortable columns & include/exclude l

Post by jonet » Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:53 pm

Hi,

Here're my suggestions for improving thumb cache maintainability:

1. The easy way: make the cache list sortable on columns. With this it'll be much easier to locate and multi-select unwanted caches (e.g. cached temporary download folders) and remove with single click.

2. The once-and-for-all solution: Use include/exclude lists to allow user difine which folders (and their subfolders) should be cached, which should not. No unwanted caches will be generated in the first place. So it will be all up to users to setup, not for Pierre to worry about any more. :D

Kichiku

Re: Cache maintainance: sortable columns & include/exclu

Post by Kichiku » Mon Apr 03, 2006 6:52 am

jonet wrote:1. The easy way: make the cache list sortable on columns. With this it'll be much easier to locate and multi-select unwanted caches (e.g. cached temporary download folders) and remove with single click.
I need sortable columns too,
my images are located in more than 300 folders,
to select caches to remove is not easy.

jonet
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:30 pm

Re: Cache maintainance: sortable columns & include/exclu

Post by jonet » Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:01 pm

Kichiku wrote: I need sortable columns too,
my images are located in more than 300 folders,
to select caches to remove is not easy.
Yes. Without sortable columns the only practical cache maintainance I can do for now is "remove all". :D

And as I have about 450,000 pics in some 6,000 folders, I find only some of them need to be cached -- the vector collections, some large folders which contain hundreds or thousands of pics. Most folders do not need to be cached. They usually contain no more than 50 pics and are not browsed frequently. And the thumbs will be generated quickly enough when I browse into them any way.

With include and exclude lists I can use no more than 20 entries to difine the desired caching behavior. And that will save up at least 4000 folders from being unnecessarily cached.

In case some users or sometimes one would like to cache everything, just make the use of include/exclude lists optional and everybody will be happy.

Some right-click menu integration into the browser, like "Cache this folder" / "Do not cache this folder", would also be helpful.

User avatar
helmut
Posts: 8153
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Post by helmut » Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:42 pm

A reasonable request with a reasonable explanation. :-) I support both of your suggestions - especially sorting is really needed.

jonet
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:30 pm

Post by jonet » Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:23 am

helmut wrote:A reasonable request with a reasonable explanation. :-) I support both of your suggestions - especially sorting is really needed.
Thank you helmut. I look forward to seeing it in the future releases. XnView rocks! :D

User avatar
helmut
Posts: 8153
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Post by helmut » Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:55 pm

jonet wrote:
helmut wrote:A reasonable request with a reasonable explanation. :-) I support both of your suggestions - especially sorting is really needed.
Thank you helmut. I look forward to seeing it in the future releases. XnView rocks! :D
Please do not expect too much: Pierre is the sole author of XnView. Pierre does listen to what I say and reads what I write, but it's no guarantee that something is implemented.

jonet
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:30 pm

Post by jonet » Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:38 pm

Thank you. I understand and I wish all the best to you and Pierre and XnView. Cheers.

User avatar
chronon
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:09 pm

Post by chronon » Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:26 pm

I just registered to post my support for this request :P I would really really like to have a exclusion list for image caching.

bravd
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:47 pm

Post by bravd » Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:27 pm

I also support this...

User avatar
Dreamer
XnThusiast
Posts: 4605
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: Cache maintainance: sortable columns & include/exclu

Post by Dreamer » Mon May 19, 2008 9:37 pm

jonet wrote:2. The once-and-for-all solution: Use include/exclude lists to allow user difine which folders (and their subfolders) should be cached, which should not. No unwanted caches will be generated in the first place. So it will be all up to users to setup, not for Pierre to worry about any more. :D
I support this one! At least the ini option, e.g.:

-cacheinclude D:\Pictures
-cacheexclude D:\Music
-cacheexclude E:\

All subfolders should be used for these options. If there will be 2 folders, e.g.:

-cacheinclude D:\Pictures
-cacheexclude D:\Pictures\Temp

...then all files in the folder Pictures should be cached, except the subfolder Temp.

I think this option would be very useful.
Dreamer

ckit
XnThusiast
Posts: 2441
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am

Post by ckit » Tue May 20, 2008 2:32 am

I support this request too!
Windows 10 Pro x64 1903
XnViewMP and Classic and PhotoFiltre Studio X

Post Reply