Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:43 am
Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
It would be nice if you could add the option to change the encoder in JPEG settings.
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 39864
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
Guetzli is already addeddamian101 wrote:It would be nice if you could add the option to change the encoder in JPEG settings.
Pierre.
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:45 am
- Location: Cheltenham, U.K.
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
Added in XnView MP 0.89 viewer and batch convert, but not yet in XnConvert (1.76 current version) ?xnview wrote:Guetzli is already addeddamian101 wrote:It would be nice if you could add the option to change the encoder in JPEG settings.
Note: included as a separate 'JPEG Guetzli' entry, and a source file size limit as been identified (thread somewhere...)
-
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
+1 for MozJPEG
Guetzli is good at compression, but takes literally forever to encode with, neither supports progressive encoding nor color profiles. MozJPEG is about as good at compression and supports the other 2 things I mentioned while being a lot faster than Guetzli.
Couldn't this be implemented like a new image format? So in the dropdown it shows up next to normal JPEG encoding? I'm especially interested in support in XnConvert.
https://www.pixelz.com/blog/guetzli-mozjpeg-comparison/
Guetzli is good at compression, but takes literally forever to encode with, neither supports progressive encoding nor color profiles. MozJPEG is about as good at compression and supports the other 2 things I mentioned while being a lot faster than Guetzli.
Couldn't this be implemented like a new image format? So in the dropdown it shows up next to normal JPEG encoding? I'm especially interested in support in XnConvert.
https://www.pixelz.com/blog/guetzli-mozjpeg-comparison/
Get the bugs fixed, THEN start adding features. It sucks, but someone has to do it.
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 39864
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
What about an optimization feature (post-processing) with support of Guetzli, MozJPEG, JpegOptim, PNGOUT, PNGCRUSH, OptiPNG??Danny wrote:+1 for MozJPEG
Guetzli is good at compression, but takes literally forever to encode with, neither supports progressive encoding nor color profiles. MozJPEG is about as good at compression and supports the other 2 things I mentioned while being a lot faster than Guetzli.
Couldn't this be implemented like a new image format? So in the dropdown it shows up next to normal JPEG encoding? I'm especially interested in support in XnConvert.
https://www.pixelz.com/blog/guetzli-mozjpeg-comparison/
Pierre.
-
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
Not exactly sure what you're picturing, but yeah. Something along those lines. As long as there is no quality reduction through re-encoding of JPEGs involved.
Get the bugs fixed, THEN start adding features. It sucks, but someone has to do it.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:43 am
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
Just to avoid misconceptions:xnview wrote: ↑Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:35 amWhat about an optimization feature (post-processing) with support of Guetzli, MozJPEG, JpegOptim, PNGOUT, PNGCRUSH, OptiPNG??Danny wrote:+1 for MozJPEG
Guetzli is good at compression, but takes literally forever to encode with, neither supports progressive encoding nor color profiles. MozJPEG is about as good at compression and supports the other 2 things I mentioned while being a lot faster than Guetzli.
Couldn't this be implemented like a new image format? So in the dropdown it shows up next to normal JPEG encoding? I'm especially interested in support in XnConvert.
https://www.pixelz.com/blog/guetzli-mozjpeg-comparison/
Guetzli and MozJPEG are alternative JPEG encoders, any conversion will result in quality loss as JPEG has no lossless mode. JpegOptim can transcode a JPEG without loosing any image information (lossless compression).
PNGOUT, PNGCRUSH and OptiPNG can also do lossless PNG encoding/compression.
GUI for the Guetzli converter: https://www.guetzliconverter.net
GUI for the MozJPEG converter (online and limited only): https://mozjpeg.codelove.de
GUI for JPEGOptim: http://www.romeolight.com/products/jpegmicro/
GUI for best PNG compression: https://pnggauntlet.com
I am not shure what you mean by optimization feature? The only tools that make sense for post-processing are tools like JPEGOptim and of course all lossless encoders. I also think all of these encoders should be implemented in XnConvert and for every JPEG encoder, there should be the option to run it through JPEGOptim after encoding (MozJPEG does this by default).
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:22 pm
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
It may be worth to add the latest Guetzli from Git. It works better here with files that had no good compression before maybe because of code optimizing and a new Butteraugli.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2015 8:24 pm
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
Hello,
If mozjpeg is not added to xnview what GUI alternative have we to batch jpeg encoding?
(near all website use it but no windows software, for example photoshop jpeg encoder is a joke :/)
I don't know why all software use mozjeg as MAIN encoder.
Artifacts on black and white caracter in picture are horrible, mozjpeg do an incredible job.
Guetzli is not better than mozjpeg and is unusable because of time encoding.
If mozjpeg is not added to xnview what GUI alternative have we to batch jpeg encoding?

(near all website use it but no windows software, for example photoshop jpeg encoder is a joke :/)
I don't know why all software use mozjeg as MAIN encoder.
Artifacts on black and white caracter in picture are horrible, mozjpeg do an incredible job.
Guetzli is not better than mozjpeg and is unusable because of time encoding.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2020 11:44 pm
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
I am also interested if there is any GUI converter with mozjpeg support?
Any plans to integrate mozjpeg in XnView in the nearest feature?
Any plans to integrate mozjpeg in XnView in the nearest feature?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:25 pm
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2022 3:08 pm
Re: Please add additional JPEG encoders like MozJPEG and Guetzli!
I use Pingo PNG (https://css-ig.net/pingo) for compressing PNGs it seems to be the best one.ashf wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:45 am +1 for Mozjpeg encoder.
For png, I would like you to add pngquant.
https://pngquant.org/
Also JPEG Guetzli seems to be abandoned, so MozJPEG would be a better option at this point.
https://github.com/google/guetzli (last release Mar 21, 2017)