Can cache remove NON-existing directories automatically ?

[Nelson]

Hi there,

Now Cache-Optimization can remove non-existing files, but keep the directory's name.
Can you remove the empty directory, too?

For example:
1. Browser a directory called "C:\test", then you can see the detail in Cache.
2. Delete the directory "C:\test" and then use Cache-Optimization function.
3. You still can see the "C:\test" in Cache detail, but it shows 0 image.

What I asked is that can it also remove the "C:\test" entry in Cache detail ?

[xnview]

Hi there,

Now Cache-Optimization can remove non-existing files, but keep the directory's name.
Can you remove the empty directory, too?

For example:
1. Browser a directory called "C:\test", then you can see the detail in Cache.
2. Delete the directory "C:\test" and then use Cache-Optimization function.
3. You still can see the "C:\test" in Cache detail, but it shows 0 image.

What I asked is that can it also remove the "C:\test" entry in Cache detail ?

Ok, i'll fix it

[Guest]

Hi there,

Now Cache-Optimization can remove non-existing files, but keep the directory's name.
Can you remove the empty directory, too?

For example:
1. Browser a directory called "C:\test", then you can see the detail in Cache.
2. Delete the directory "C:\test" and then use Cache-Optimization function.
3. You still can see the "C:\test" in Cache detail, but it shows 0 image.

What I asked is that can it also remove the "C:\test" entry in Cache detail ?

Ok, i'll fix it

It doesn't seem to be fixed in 1.82 RC3.
Or, will you fix it in the future version ?

Thanks for your reply

[xnview]

Hi there,

Now Cache-Optimization can remove non-existing files, but keep the directory's name.
Can you remove the empty directory, too?

For example:
1. Browser a directory called "C:\test", then you can see the detail in Cache.
2. Delete the directory "C:\test" and then use Cache-Optimization function.
3. You still can see the "C:\test" in Cache detail, but it shows 0 image.

What I asked is that can it also remove the "C:\test" entry in Cache detail ?

Ok, i'll fix it

It doesn't seem to be fixed in 1.82 RC3.
Or, will you fix it in the future version ?

Thanks for your reply

Yes in a 1.83

[ckit]

Postphoned.