Slideshow: Delete key, option to change resampling algorithm

Ideas for improvements and requests for new features in XnView Classic

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply
Guest

Slideshow: Delete key, option to change resampling algorithm

Post by Guest »

First I must say XnView is fantastic! I especially love the ability to very quickly create a slideshow from a folder and all its subfolders.

I often find a bad image that needs deleting when running a slideshow. The ability to delete the current image by pressing a key, followed by confirmation dialog window, would be very helpful.

Xnview already has many different resampling algorithms for resizing an image. It would be a great improvement there was an option to chose the same algorithms for the slideshow! I know that there is already an option to chose "high quality" (=bilinear?), but why not have the others also, allowing more choices between quality and speed? ACDSee, although inferior in many other aspects, has bicubic as standard for resizing and unfortunately this means the Xnview compares unfavorable when doing a quick evaluation. Having the ability to choose between all the algorithms already implemented would really differentiate Xnview from all other viewers!
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46236
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Slideshow: Delete key, option to change resampling algor

Post by xnview »

Anonymous wrote:First I must say XnView is fantastic! I especially love the ability to very quickly create a slideshow from a folder and all its subfolders.
Thanks
I often find a bad image that needs deleting when running a slideshow. The ability to delete the current image by pressing a key, followed by confirmation dialog window, would be very helpful.
There is another thread wbout this request
Xnview already has many different resampling algorithms for resizing an image. It would be a great improvement there was an option to chose the same algorithms for the slideshow! I know that there is already an option to chose "high quality" (=bilinear?), but why not have the others also, allowing more choices between quality and speed? ACDSee, although inferior in many other aspects, has bicubic as standard for resizing and unfortunately this means the Xnview compares unfavorable when doing a quick evaluation. Having the ability to choose between all the algorithms already implemented would really differentiate Xnview from all other viewers!
Ok
Pierre.
qda
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:41 am

Post by qda »

good suggestions
Post Reply