When I select for example "More than 1600 width" in the search dialogue, it also lists those images, which exactly have 1600 pixel width.
Actually this term is incorrect. Label must be "At least", or it must not list the 1600 width images also.
Less then / equal / More than in Search
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
Re: Less then / equal / More than in Search
What is the best? Changing label for "At least" or not have equality?vladivostok wrote:When I select for example "More than 1600 width" in the search dialogue, it also lists those images, which exactly have 1600 pixel width.
Actually this term is incorrect. Label must be "At least", or it must not list the 1600 width images also.
Pierre.
Re: Less then / equal / More than in Search
I'm not native speaker but "At least" sounds clumsy to me. And what's the opposite? Hmm, perhaps "With a minimum of" and "With a maximum of" might work, but again clumsy.xnview wrote:...
What is the best? Changing label for "At least" or not have equality?

Currently I'd prefer "More than" or "Less than" and have no equality.
Last edited by helmut on Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.