1.95 - XnView very slow

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:34 am

xnview wrote:So not big at all. And always slow with this 300Kb DB?
Do you use categories?

v1.94 is very fast with cache 400+ mb (my old db before optimizing with v1.95). After upgrading to v1.95 browser opens very very slow

I dont use categories - category.db = 10 kb.

Post by **xnview** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:35 am

Anonymous wrote:
xnview wrote:So not big at all. And always slow with this 300Kb DB?
Do you use categories?
v1.94 is very fast with cache 400+ mb (my old db before optimizing with v1.95). After upgrading to v1.95 browser opens very very slow
I dont use categories - category.db = 10 kb.

So slow with or without optimized DB.
Could you send me your email by PM

Post by **xnview** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:52 am

Ok, it seems that there is a little problem with last sqlite lib and DB, so if you have a problem, send me your email by PM...

Micha · Post by **Micha** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:00 pm

Optimizing dosn't help, it stay slow. Only rename the old DB helps, but it could be nice to keep it.

Post by **xnview** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:17 pm

Micha wrote:Optimizing dosn't help, it stay slow. Only rename the old DB helps, but it could be nice to keep it.

Please send me your email by PM

r251 · Post by **r251** » Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:46 pm

really, open folder with 1.5 gb raw+jpeg
in version 1.94.2 - 1,5 sek
1.95 - 5-6 sek.
cache optimize - not effect.
leave on 1.94.x

Post by **xnview** » Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:36 am

r251 wrote:really, open folder with 1.5 gb raw+jpeg
in version 1.94.2 - 1,5 sek
1.95 - 5-6 sek.
cache optimize - not effect.
leave on 1.94.x

Contact me by PM

Post by **xnview** » Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:20 am

Nobody with slow browsing to test a fixed version??

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:59 pm

xnview wrote:Nobody with slow browsing to test a fixed version??

Where is the fixed version?

Post by **xnview** » Tue Oct 21, 2008 1:18 pm

Anonymous wrote:
xnview wrote:Nobody with slow browsing to test a fixed version??
Where is the fixed version?

Send me your email by PM

metallithrax · Post by **metallithrax** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:51 am

Got a few figures for you

cache size 1019MB

using 1.94 - 1min 15 secs to open thumbs

using 1.95 - no thumbs after 5 mins

1.95.1 wouldn't run, it opened the "DOS" windows then stopped.

I will try it on another machine.

Post by **xnview** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:54 am

metallithrax wrote: 1.95.1 wouldn't run, it opened the "DOS" windows then stopped.

????? which link do you have downloaded?

matt1696 · Post by **matt1696** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:18 pm

Tested here with the 1.95.1 version downloaded from Betanews.

It's was a lot quicker than 1.95, but still significantly slower than 1.94.2.

Returned to 1.94.2 for now.

Post by **xnview** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:40 pm

matt1696 wrote:Tested here with the 1.95.1 version downloaded from Betanews.
It's was a lot quicker than 1.95, but still significantly slower than 1.94.2.
Returned to 1.94.2 for now.

Really? I've tested and for me the speed is almost the same. Slower for how many?
How many files do you have?

metallithrax · Post by **metallithrax** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:30 pm

xnview wrote:
metallithrax wrote: 1.95.1 wouldn't run, it opened the "DOS" windows then stopped.
????? which link do you have downloaded?

I'm using the version you emailed me.

It works on a couple of machines at work but not others.

Unfortunately the ones it works on don't have big databases