Browser crashes on attached JPEG

[GeorgD]

Hi all, after fresh XnView 1.96.1 install on fresh install Win7 RC1 64bit German I used XnView and it worked until I opened a folder containing the JPEG http://rapidshare.de/files/47336936/P4219546.JPG.html in browse mode. Other image viewers don't have trouble with the file.
Best regards, Georg

[Clo]

GeorgD

Hello Georg !

• Glad to see you again here !
• Well, I can confirm the crash here, I tested the image in Browser mode, it's the only in the folder…

AppName: xnview.exe AppVer: 1.96.0.0 ModName: xnview.exe
ModVer: 1.96.0.0 Offset: 001c1e3e

- No problem in View mode, though. I tested on Win XP-Pro SP1 - 32 bits (thus, it isn't OS-related…)
• Aside :  Sorry, sorry, but I ought say that this image-hosting sucks a lot…  

KR
Claude
Clo

[xnview]

http://rapidshare.de/files/47336936/P4219546.JPG.html in browse mode. Other image viewers don't have trouble with the file.

I have problem to get this file

[XnTriq]

I can't confirm the crash on Windows 2000, but JPEGsnoop is reporting two errors:

Code: Select all

*** Decoding SCAN Data ***
  OFFSET: 0x00004AD5
  Scan Decode Mode: Full IDCT (AC + DC)

  Scan Data encountered marker   0xFFD9 @ 0x002F0FE0.0
  Scan Data encountered marker   0xFFD8 @ 0x002F0FE2.0
  NOTE: Marker wasn't EOI (0xFFD9)

Code: Select all

*** Embedded JPEG Thumbnail ***
  Offset: 0x00002000
  Length: 0x00001A26 (6694)

<-- snip -->

  * Embedded Thumb Marker: DHT
    Length = 418
ERROR: Expected marker 0xFF, got 0xA9 @ offset 0x0000226D

I have problem to get this file

Me too. I had to pull it out from Firefox's cache (3.150.854 bytes).

[Clo]

Pierre

Hello !

• The faulty JPEG is in your mail-box, as attached in a RAR archive…

KR
Claude
Clo

[GeorgD]

Hey Pierre,

that image is the only one I ever got from my digi cam making troubles. In case avoiding the crash is much work on exception handling, you may just ignore it - one bad in >30.000 pics is OK for me

@Claude

Hello Georg ! Glad to see you again here !
• Aside :  Sorry, sorry, but I ought say that this image-hosting sucks a lot…  

yes, I've focused on other software areas during the last 2 years. I'm having some free time during autumn and plan to organize & geo-tag my complete image collection -- so it's quite probable that I'll be present in the forums and also have a look at the old threads I've been interested in

Yes, rapidshare is not the most convenient service that is not altering images, but I didn't find a better quickly. I'm happy to receive recommendations Thanks for forwarding the image to pierre!

Best regards, Georg

[marsh]

>GeorgD
You might be interested in following this 'geo' feature in XnView MP: (from topic, Some new screenshots)

[GeorgD]

>GeorgD
You might be interested in following this 'geo' feature in XnView MP: (from topic, Some new screenshots)

Thanks, I checked it out - MP has a really nice, efficient, modern interface and showing the location is great. Sadly, it is still in early stage and lacks too much functionality for my use case, e.g. the map delay is too high (is >20sek!), I can't set the default zoom level, show multiple files at once, use Google Maps Terrain, change the location on the map, use Microsoft Bird View,... Hence, for Geo I will continue GetSetter, but will re-check XnViewMP every now and then Remark: I opened a topic for that, see http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=18702

[xnview]

the map delay is too high (is >20sek!)

???? Really, the map appears in 2 sec for me

[GeorgD]

the map delay is too high (is >20sek!)

???? Really, the map appears in 2 sec for me

Yes, it really was. Now it's quicker, around 2-3sec. In GeoSetter it always appears within 1-3 sec, so it's not my connection.

[xnview]

Yes, it really was. Now it's quicker, around 2-3sec. In GeoSetter it always appears within 1-3 sec, so it's not my connection.

The file loaded is on ww.xnview.com site, so perhaps was slower