[v23] {date[yyyy]} don't work
Moderator: xnview
-
Kadet
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2022 7:23 pm
[v23] {date[yyyy]} don't work
Rename funcion {name[4-8]} work, but {date[yyyy]} not.
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 48628
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: [v23] {date[yyyy]} don't work
Date is not an example, please try {exif:dateModified[yyyy]}
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 48628
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: [v23] {date[yyyy]} don't work
is it good?
-
Kadet
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2022 7:23 pm
Re: [v23] {date[yyyy]} don't work
Yes, it's work, as you wrote.
BTW. When pressing NAME, it would be nice if it showed {name[1-"max"]}. It is easier to delete unnecessary characters than to add [...]. For novices, there should also be a guide to these additional filters [...].
BTW. When pressing NAME, it would be nice if it showed {name[1-"max"]}. It is easier to delete unnecessary characters than to add [...]. For novices, there should also be a guide to these additional filters [...].
-
B.Douille
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:25 pm
- Location: Hte Savoie - France
Re: [v23] {date[yyyy]} don't work
I would agree with Kadet on including a sample of formatting option. On desktops and laptops, average users don’t give time to RTFM. It even doesn't exit on mobile Apps.
For example, I didn't know about substring {name[1-"max"]} as mentioned by Kadet. For date and time, the mix of upper/lower char is still a question for me. Better to learn via samples:
{file:modifiedDate[yyyyMMdd_HHmmss]}
For example, I didn't know about substring {name[1-"max"]} as mentioned by Kadet. For date and time, the mix of upper/lower char is still a question for me. Better to learn via samples:
{file:modifiedDate[yyyyMMdd_HHmmss]}
Daniel, happy user for 20 years, to manage photo and videos and share them in slideshows (Windows 11, Linux Ubuntu and Android)