Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
it now works correctly for "name (numeric)", but "name" is now broken. the situation is reversed. can it be fixed so both work correctly?
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
'name' is broken???ghost zero wrote:it now works correctly for "name (numeric)", but "name" is now broken. the situation is reversed. can it be fixed so both work correctly?
Pierre.
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
doing the same thing for "name" is now broken
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Sorry can't reproduce...ghost zero wrote:doing the same thing for "name" is now broken
Pierre.
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
doing the same thing below now works correctly for sort by "name numeric". but for doing the same thing for the regular sort by "name", it has the problem.
ghost zero wrote:here are screenshots. first is sorted by "name numeric" and second is by "date". this was after a change timestamp applied to all at once and they're supposed to be sorted the same in both screenshots, but notice they're not because of the bug...
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
any chance of fixing this yet?