Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Bugs found in XnView Classic. Please report only one bug per topic!

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview

ghost zero
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm

Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Post by ghost zero »

it now works correctly for "name (numeric)", but "name" is now broken. the situation is reversed. can it be fixed so both work correctly?
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Post by xnview »

ghost zero wrote:it now works correctly for "name (numeric)", but "name" is now broken. the situation is reversed. can it be fixed so both work correctly?
'name' is broken???
Pierre.
ghost zero
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm

Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Post by ghost zero »

doing the same thing for "name" is now broken
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Post by xnview »

ghost zero wrote:doing the same thing for "name" is now broken
Sorry can't reproduce...
Pierre.
ghost zero
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm

Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Post by ghost zero »

doing the same thing below now works correctly for sort by "name numeric". but for doing the same thing for the regular sort by "name", it has the problem.
ghost zero wrote:here are screenshots. first is sorted by "name numeric" and second is by "date". this was after a change timestamp applied to all at once and they're supposed to be sorted the same in both screenshots, but notice they're not because of the bug...

Image

Image
ghost zero
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:26 pm

Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...

Post by ghost zero »

any chance of fixing this yet?
Post Reply